Skip to main content
Speclore

Rankine Efficiency

Reference data and engineering information about rankine efficiency for thermodynamics applications.

rankineefficiencyCalculator

Overview

The Rankine cycle is the ideal cycle for steam power plants. It describes the conversion of heat into work using water/steam as the working fluid.

Formula

η=WnetQin=(h1h2)(h4h3)h1h4\eta = \frac{W_{net}}{Q_{in}} = \frac{(h_1 - h_2) - (h_4 - h_3)}{h_1 - h_4}

Calculator

Notes

  • Results are approximate and should be verified for critical applications
  • Input values should be within reasonable engineering ranges

Rankine vs Carnot Cycle

The Rankine cycle addresses a practical limitation of the Carnot cycle. In a Carnot cycle, steam is only partially condensed, requiring a large compressor to handle the two-phase mixture. The Rankine cycle improves upon this by fully condensing the steam to liquid before compression, enabling the use of a smaller, more efficient feed pump.

Efficiency Formula

The Rankine cycle efficiency is defined as:

μR=HiHeHihc\mu_R = \frac{H_i - H_e}{H_i - h_c}

Where:

  • μR\mu_R — Rankine cycle efficiency (dimensionless)
  • HiH_i — Specific enthalpy at turbine inlet (kJ/kg)
  • HeH_e — Specific enthalpy at turbine outlet (kJ/kg)
  • hch_c — Sensible heat (specific enthalpy) of saturated liquid in the condenser exhaust (kJ/kg)

The numerator (HiHe)(H_i - H_e) represents the work extracted by the turbine, while the denominator (Hihc)(H_i - h_c) represents the total heat input to the cycle from the boiler.

Key Characteristics

Parameter Carnot Cycle Rankine Cycle
Compression medium Liquid-vapor mixture Saturated liquid only
Pump size Large Small
Condensation Partial Complete
Practical application Theoretical limit Practical power plants

Notes

The Rankine cycle is the foundational thermodynamic cycle for steam-based power generation, including coal, nuclear, and concentrated solar power plants. The key advantage over the Carnot cycle is the reduction in pumping work, as compressing a liquid requires significantly less energy than compressing a two-phase mixture.

References